Conformity Assessment of the G7 ? Database

There is a need for certification in the printing industry worldwide. Printing certification systems, such as the G7^(r) developed by IDEAlliance, have been adopted successfully in the U.S. and Asian printing industries. In order to increase the value of certification, there is � a need to analyze the percent pass/fail � (%pass) of all jobs submitted as a whole and by printing process. Indeed, it is in the mutual interests of printers and print buyers to find out how a certification scheme performs as it applies to the real printing industry. Are the tolerances too tight or too loose? It is equally valuable to determine if a particular conformity requirement and its associated tolerance causes more non-conformance than other requirements. A database of more than 700 data files, measured from the P2P25 targets and made available from Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), was analyzed.

The results � of this � analysis showed � that: (1) 59% of the submissions � passed the official G7^(r) � criteria, � while � 82% passed the relaxed tolerances; (2) gray balance (?C_h) was the major cause of non-conformance � as opposed to tone reproduction � requirements; � and (3) digital � printing yielded � more passing files (73%) than � offset printing (56%) under � the G7^(r) � criteria � Additionally, � Fujifilm � has proposed � a different � conformity assessment system with three requirements and one metric (?E₀₀). These results showed that this method had a lower %pass than the official G7^(r) method.