PRINTING United Alliance Named to EPA Small Business Panel on Expanded Air Emissions Reporting
by Gary Jones, Vice President of Environmental, Health, and Safety Affairs Jul 26, 2022

Gary Jones, Director, Environmental, Health, and Safety Affairs for PRINTING United Alliance was only one of nine small business representatives appointed to participate in a small business panel on Expanded Air Emissions Reporting created by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The business panel is required under Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, or SBREFA. SBREFA panels are required anytime an agency seeks to issue a new regulation that impacts small business. Participation on the panel provides the opportunity to provide feedback and suggested revisions to the proposed regulation prior to it being released for public review and comment.  

The panel was asked to provide feedback on EPA’s development of proposed revisions to the existing Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR) rule that was last revised in February 2015. The Agency’s proposal covers an expansion of the existing reporting requirements and may add reporting requirements to gather data about hazardous air pollutants, emissions rate test results from facilities, emissions from facilities in Indian Country that are not currently reporting emissions data, and emissions from small electricity generating units, primarily backup generators, used intermittently, such as to meet demand on high electricity usage days.  

Following the initial meeting held on June 14, 2022, PRINTING United Alliance submitted written comments at the end of June raising concerns regarding the impact the reporting rule would have on small printing operations, many of which are not required to submit emission data to their state or local air pollution control authority. The proposed reporting requirements were very extensive and would require most printing operations to either learn how to conduct extensive emission calculations or hire an outside consultant to perform them. The EPA proposed a reporting threshold of 4.4 pounds per year for many of the Hazardous Air Pollutants found in the printing industry. PRINTING United Alliance's comments objected to these proposed reporting thresholds. It was suggested that an alternative approach based on material consumption amounts tied to emissions be used to simplify the process for small businesses. 

As a next step, the EPA will review the comments submitted, consider them, and hold a second meeting of the panel. EPA will present their current thinking to the panel and ask for additional feedback in a second meeting of the panel which will occur when EPA convenes it.  

PRINTING United Alliance seeks to keep the printing industry updated on workplace requirements related to environmental compliance. For more information, or if you have questions on this or any other state regulatory program, please contact Marci Kinter, mkinter@printing.org or Gary Jones, gjones@printing.org.    

  

Business Environmental
Gary Jones Vice President of Environmental, Health, and Safety Affairs
Hire This Expert

Gary A. Jones is the Vice President of Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Affairs at PRINTING United Alliance in Fairfax, VA. His primary responsibility is to monitor and analyze EHS regulatory activities at all domestic and some international government levels. He provides representation on behalf of the printing and specialty graphic imaging industry. Mr. Jones works closely with the federal and state-level Environmental Protection Agencies (EPA), Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA), Department of Transportation (DOT), and other agencies. He also provides membership assistance on EHS compliance and sustainability programs through a variety of approaches including responding to inquiries, presentations, writing, and consulting services.

He holds a BS in biology from LaRoche College and an MS in chemistry from the University of Pittsburgh.

Speaking Topics:

  • Regulatory compliance and sustainability
  • Webinars on a wide variety of EHS related topics
  • Customized seminars and workshops, including: Compliance Today, Beyond Compliance Tomorrow, OSHA Compliance Essentials, and Hazardous Waste Boot Camp
  • Two-day workshops Environmental Compliance for Printers and OSHA Compliance for Printing

Related Content

Department of Labor Issues New Final Overtime Rule

The Department of Labor (DOL) has issued the final rule revising the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Overtime Rule (OT Rule). The new rule will become effective on July 1, 2024. The OT Rule provides the framework for companies to determine whether an employee must receive overtime compensation for working more than 40 hours each week. The OT Rule has three tests to categorize workers as either “Exempt” from overtime wages or “Non-exempt” from overtime wages, which means that the employee would receive at least the 150% of applicable wages (time and a half) mandated by the OT Rule.

Proforma Distributor Owner, Chas Shramek, Secures Seven-Figure Retail Superstore Deal for Valued Client

TAMPA, FLA. (April 30, 2024) – Proforma, the $650 million technology and business success leader, proudly acknowledges Chas Shramek, President and Owner of Proforma Connected. His recent achievement in securing a seven-figure deal has led to the successful placement of branded products within a prominent retail superstore on behalf of a valued client. Through this feat, Shramek, an esteemed member of Proforma’s Multi-Million Dollar Club with over 15 years of industry experience, exemplifies the dedication and persistence that have become synonymous with the Proforma brand.

Federal Trade Commission Bans Non-Competition Agreements

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned companies from using non-competition agreements – generally referred to as “noncompetes” in employment agreements, severance agreements, and other contracts. The purpose of noncompetes is to protect employers from being competitively disadvantaged by companies that hire their employees away from them and then benefit from that former employee’s inside knowledge of the company, which theoretically provides an unfair advantage to the hiring company.
}