Lexington printer to Kentucky Supreme Court: Uphold expressive freedom
Apr 11, 2018
FRANKFORT, Ky. – Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed their brief Tuesday with the Kentucky Supreme Court on behalf of a Lexington promotional printer who wishes to operate his business consistent with his faith. In October of last year, the state high court agreed to hear the case, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals. Two lower courts have already upheld the freedom of Blaine Adamson and his promotional print shop, Hands On Originals, to decline to print messages that violate Adamson’s beliefs. “No one should be forced to express messages that conflict with their beliefs,” said ADF Senior Counsel Jim Campbell. “As we explain in our brief, Blaine serves all people. He simply declines to print messages that conflict with his faith. The law gives him and everyone else that freedom.” In February, the Kentucky Supreme Court received 13 friend-of-the-court briefs in support of Adamson’s freedom, including briefs from Gov. Matt Bevin and 10 states. The court received only one brief in support of the government. As Hands On Originals’ brief explains, “The right to decide what to say and what not to say—to choose which ideas to express—is core to human freedom…. It explains why most recoil at the thought of forcing a Democrat to make signs for a Republican politician, a gay man to create posters opposing same-sex marriage, a Jewish woman to make shirts celebrating German pride, or anyone to create flyers for a cause at odds with their conscience. And it establishes why the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission…cannot require Hands On Originals…and its Managing Owner, Blaine Adamson, to print messages conflicting with their faith….” The brief relates how Adamson’s faith inspires him and his shop to love and serve others. One way that they do this is through a joint program with nonprofit religious group Adopt Uganda. That program provides unemployed women in Uganda with income by hiring them to create hand-woven baskets. “The faith of HOO’s owners not only motivates them to serve the marginalized, it also places limits on what HOO can do,” the brief states. “HOO will not print items that convey or otherwise support messages inconsistent with its owners’ religious beliefs.” “We are asking the Kentucky Supreme Court to affirm the First Amendment’s promise that everyone, including printers like Blaine, can decide for themselves the ideas and beliefs that they choose to express,” said ADF-allied attorney and co-counsel Bryan Beauman of Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney, PLLC, of Lexington. “That’s a freedom that every American deserves.” The case began in 2012 when Adamson declined to print shirts with a message promoting the Lexington Pride Festival, an event that the Gay and Lesbian Services Organization hosted. Although he declined to print the shirts because of the message that would have been on them, he nevertheless offered to refer the GLSO to another printer who would have made the shirts. Unsatisfied, the GLSO filed a complaint with the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission—despite eventually receiving the shirts for free from another printer. In 2014, the commission ruled that Adamson must print messages that conflict with his faith when customers ask him to do so.
Something to be Said About Breaking Even
The goal of every enterprise should be to, at least, get even when their fiscal year is over.